Select Page

Spokesman for special counsel denies existence of document at heart of revelation in Fire and Fury sequel, Siege: Trump Under Fire

A new book from Fire and Fury author Michael Wolff says special counsel Robert Mueller drew up a three-count obstruction of justice indictment against Donald Trump before deciding to shelve it an explosive claim which a spokesman for Mueller flatly denied.

The stunning revelation is contained in Siege: Trump Under Fire, which will be published a week from now, on 4 June. It is the sequel to Fire and Fury, Wolffs bestseller on the first year of the Trump presidency which was published in 2018.

The Guardian obtained a copy of Siege and viewed the documents concerned.

In an authors note, Wolff states that his findings on the Mueller investigation are based on internal documents given to me by sources close to the Office of the Special Counsel.

But Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller, told the Guardian: The documents that youve described do not exist.

Photograph: AP

Questions over the provenance of the documents will only add to controversy and debate around the launch of Wolffs eagerly awaited new book.

Fire and Fury shone a harsh spotlight on dysfunction within the Trump White House and engendered huge controversy after the Guardian broke news of its contents. Many of Wolffs assertions were confirmed by later works, among them Fear: Trump in the White House by the Watergate reporter Bob Woodward. The book prompted the banishment of the Trump adviser and Wolff source Stephen Bannon, who also lost his place at Breitbart News. It sold close to 5 million copies.

Mueller was appointed in May 2017 to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election, links between Trump aides and Moscow and potential obstruction of justice by the president.

Muellers final report was handed to the attorney general, William Barr, on 22 March this year and made public in redacted form on 18 April. Mueller did not find a conspiracy between Trump and Russia but did lay out 11 possible instances of obstruction of justice, indicating Congress should decide what came next.

Barr said he had judged the instances of possible obstruction not to be conclusive. Trump and his supporters have claimed total exoneration. Democrats in Congress are weighing whether impeachment is merited.

And yet Wolff reports that Muellers office drew up a three-count outline of the presidents alleged abuses, under the title United States of America against Donald J Trump, Defendant. The document sat on the special counsels desk, Wolff writes, for almost a year.

According to a document seen by the Guardian, the first count, under Title 18, United States code, Section 1505, charged the president with corruptly or by threats of force or threatening communication influencing, obstructing or impeding a pending proceeding before a department or agency of the United States.

The second count, under section 1512, charged the president with tampering with a witness, victim or informant.

The third count, under section 1513, charged the president with retaliating against a witness, victim or informant.

The document is the most significant aspect of Wolffs new book.

Wolff writes that the draft indictment he examines says Trumps attempts to obstruct justice began on the seventh day of his administration, tracing the line of obstruction from National Security Advisor Michael Flynns lies to the FBI about his contacts with Russian representative[s], to the presidents efforts to have [FBI director] James Comey protect Flynn, to Comeys firing, to the presidents efforts to interfere with the special counsels investigation, to his attempt to cover up his son and son-in-laws meeting with Russian governmental agents, to his moves to interfere with Deputy Director of the FBI Andrew McCabes testimony

The draft indictment, Wolff writes, also spelled out what Mueller considered to be the overriding theme of Trumps presidency: the extraordinary lengths taken to protect himself from legal scrutiny and accountability, and to undermine the official panels investigating his actions.

According to Wolff, Mueller endured tortured deliberations over whether to charge the president, and even more tortured deliberations over the presidents power to dismiss him or his boss, the then deputy attorney general, Rod Rosenstein. Mueller ultimately demurred, Wolff writes, but his teams work gave rise to as many as 13 other investigations that led to cooperating witness plea deals from Michael Cohen, David Pecker of American Media and Trump Organization accountant Allen Weisselberg.

The Jews always flip, was Trumps comment on those deals, according to Wolff.

In one of many echoes of Fire and Fury, such shocking remarks by Trump are salted throughout Siege.

Robert Mueller and his wife Ann Cabell Standish
leave Easter services in Washington in April. Photograph: Andrew Harnik/AP

The justice departments Office of Legal Counsel had said a sitting president could not be indicted. According to Wolff, Muellers team drew up both the three-count indictment of Trump and a draft memorandum of law opposing an anticipated motion to dismiss.

In his 448-page redacted final report the special counsel briefly noted that his office had concluded it would accept previous justice department guidance that it did not have the power to prosecute a sitting president.

The draft memorandum quoted by Wolff argues that nowhere does the law say the president cannot be indicted and nowhere is the president accorded a different status under the law than other federal officials, all of whom can be indicted, convicted and impeached.

The document says: The Impeachment Judgment Clause, which applies equally to all civil officers including the president takes for granted that an officer may be subject to indictment and prosecution before impeachment. If it did not, the clause would be creating, for civil officers, precisely the immunity the Framers rejected.

The memorandum rejected the argument that the burden of a criminal process on the president would interfere with his ability to carry out his duties.

Of Muellers thinking, Wolff writes that as a former FBI director, he had not risen to the highest levels of the federal government by misconstruing the limits of bureaucratic power, and had therefore continually weighed the odds with his staff about whether the president would fire them. Thus, Wolff writes, the very existence of the special counsels investigation had in a sense become the paramount issue of the investigation itself.

According to Wolff, a memo circulated internally asked: Can President Trump order [then attorney general Jeff] Sessions to withdraw the special counsel regulations (and fire him if he doesnt)?

The short answer is yes.

Muellers team also believed Trump could have fired Mueller directly, Wolff says, arguing that the special counsel regulations are unconstitutional insofar as they limit his ability to fire the special counsel.

Trump has claimed to have had the right to fire Mueller, but he has also denied Don McGahns testimony to Mueller that he was ordered to do so. Trump is now seeking to stop the former White House counsel testifying to Congress.

In another memo quoted by Wolff, Muellers staff wondered what would happen to the special counsels office, staff, records, pending investigations and grand juries reviewing evidence if Mueller was fired.

To preserve their work, Wolff writes, they decided to share grand jury materials with fellow prosecutors. That process led, for example, to the investigation into Cohen being handed to the southern district of New York.

In the end, Wolff writes, Mueller concluded that the truth of the matter was straightforward: that while the president had the support of the majority party, he had the winning hand.

Read more: